Governance coverage
OPTIMIZATION OPPORTUNITY — extend governance with intent
50%
Enterprise AI governance before production exposure
Are your Agents under control?
Building agents is easy. Governance decisions are not.
CARE shows which agents lack adequate control, where accountability is unclear, and what must be fixed before they scale.
- Before investing heavily into building agents.
- Before wasting months arguing about accountability.
- Before it breaks your business.
- Stop building agents that should never go live
- Set clear ownership and accountability structures
- Stay in control when the unexpected happens
Agent portfolio dashboard
Attention required
⚠️ An agent is active without adequate control
Risk has outpaced governance. Scaling without controls is not secured.
Low scale limits impact for now — not the strength of your controls.
Governance gaps
1
Risk level exceeds maturity level (both scored)
Agents total
2
Where you need to intervene now
Where harm can show up — before you go deeper.
Customer Complaints Specialist
- Maturity 40% (level 2 of 5)
- Limit use until an owner and controls are in place.
Customer Service (CSR), Refunds & Returns
- Max structural risk level: 5 / 5
- 1 active agent(s) in this process
- Assign an owner. Define the intervention path.
CARE controls agentic risk by providing clarity on accountability, insights into viability, contingency plans, and traceable regulatory evidence, based on structured evaluation of ownership, risk, and control readiness.
How ungoverned Agents fail
Keep your company out of the headlines.
When Agents break governance, failure quickly becomes expensive, public and difficult to contain.
The Accountability gap
Agents outpace accountability
Agents decide automatically, across systems and teams, without a clear line of ownership.
When something goes wrong, the question isn't what happened. It's who owns it?
CARE makes ownership explicit across decisions, consequences and exposure. Accountability is never left to interpretation.
Proper CARE
How to achieve Systematic Agent Control?
Agents aren't safe by default. To turn potential into performance, you need control. Agentic risks must be classified, accountability owned, interventions enforced, and learning built into operations.
That's the COIL cycle: Classify. Own. Intervene. Learn.
It's the foundation of Agentic Control.
And CARE is the COIL for your business.
Plans & pricing
CARE grows with your Agentic Strategy.
- Free — see the problem
- Starter — structure decisions
- Pro — run governance
- Control — stay in control when it matters
- Enterprise — scale governance across the organization
CARE helps you decide what agents are allowed to exist—and keeps them under control once they do. Progress from diagnostic visibility (Free) through governed proposals (Starter) and operational governance (Pro), to the Control layer for business-critical agents, and Enterprise for deep integration, rollout, and advisory.
What CARE gives you
A governance system for deciding what is allowed to exist.
Governance by Design
CARE embeds governance into agent development - so that agents go live with ownership, viability and risk already resolved.
Make ownership explicit
Process, product, engineering, operations and compliance do not carry the same responsibilities. CARE makes the actual accountability model visible before anything ships.
Define control and recovery
CARE defines what happens when things go wrong: detection, escalation, containment and recovery. Because when it happens, that's the last thing you want to discover by trial and error.
How CARE works
From enthusiasm to governed execution.
1
Classify the agent
Start with intended delegation, process criticality, business impact and risk class. CARE makes the proposal legible before teams disappear into tooling and demos.
2
Test governance viability
Assess ownership, evidence, controls, operational readiness and intervention paths. CARE shows whether the organization can actually govern this agent in production.
3
Approve, constrain or stop
CARE turns findings into a clear decision: proceed, proceed with conditions, redesign, or do not build. Governance stays ahead of delivery instead of behind failure.
When it counts
When do you need CARE?
When agents start affecting real outcomes
Decisions touch customers, revenue, suppliers, or business-critical processes. If a failure would escape the lab, you need explicit risk class, ownership, and controls—not another demo.
When accountability becomes unclear
Ownership is argued after the fact, or no one can show who approved what under which assumptions. CARE makes the accountability model explicit before exposure spreads.
When governance discussions slow execution
Legal, risk, and engineering revisit the same questions without a durable decision record. CARE turns governance into a repeatable path so teams can ship with defensible boundaries.
When regulatory or internal scrutiny increases
Policies tighten, audits multiply, or regulators expect evidence of human oversight and control. CARE gives you consistent documentation and rationale across the agent portfolio.
CARE for accountability
Why you should CARE
Because building agents is easy.
Someone still owns the consequences.
Because technical controls don't remove accountability.
And accountability is what gets tested.
Because agentic failure scales rapidly.
And someone has to answer for it.
Risk scales faster than control
Start Agentic Governance today
Governance is the key to successful AI adoption. Use CARE as the entry point into serious AI governance. Start with the risk class, or talk through where your current pilot approach fails to create enterprise-grade control.